The Senate General Education Policies and Guidelines provide criteria for all Gen Ed courses as well as requirements for each Gen Ed category. The below information is pulled directly from EP.17.74 (some bolding has been added for emphasis) and used in evaluation of Gen Ed (Re)Certification. Sponsors offering and intending on submitting Gen Ed courses should read the information below and refer to the complete EP.17.74 policy. Each section provides the relevant questions (CIM-C Questions) required for submitting a Gen Ed (Re)Certification proposal as well as the Review Criteria pulled directly from the Gen Ed Board Feedback Forms. View the Successful Gen Ed Proposals page to view sponsor responses to the criteria.
EP.17.74The Morrill College Land Grant Act of 1862 under which the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign was founded sought to promote “liberal and practical education” and included both specialized education in the agricultural and mechanical arts and General Education in other “scientific and classical studies.” From its founding, the University of Illinois faculty has maintained requirements recognizing the Morrill Act’s distinct but complementary goals of specialized and General Education. These educational aims remain vital today, with specialized or professional education intended to prepare students for their chosen careers and with General Education intended to increase their knowledge and understanding of the wider range of historical, philosophical, scientific, political, ethical, and aesthetic concerns, and other dimensions of thought and human experience. Specialized and General Education are complementary educational aims that generate the basic framework for undergraduate education at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Guidelines for All General Education Courses
The Gen Ed Program and Specialized Curriculum have complementary, but distinct goals and aims, as outlined in the quote above pulled from the Gen Ed Policy EP.17.74. To appropriately balance specialized with General Educational aims, the guidelines set for Gen Ed courses ensure courses approved as Gen Ed follow the true spirit of the Gen Ed Program by meeting both the general guidelines as well as the specific content area/category.
Category specific criteria may be found in the section below.
Gen Ed Course Format & Content Criteria
The below course format criteria and course content criteria applies to all Gen Ed courses.
Gen Ed Course General Guidelines & Format Criteria (Requirements)
- Undergraduate course
- Course may not include Graduate Sections/Enrollment
- Minimum of 3 credit hours
- Meets for at least 3 hours per week, Refer to Office of the Provost Assigning Credit Hours
- Credit hours should not be variable
- 100- or 200-level course, with the exception of courses approved in only the following areas:
- Advanced Composition: Focused on writing in the disciplinary subject matter may be 100-, 200-, 300-, or 400-level
- Quantitative Reasoning II: May be 100-, 200-, or 300-level
- Other 300- or 400-level courses beyond the exceptions listed above are infrequent and will be closely scrutinized to ensure they follow the Gen Ed spirit, aim, and meet all other Gen Ed course criteria listed on this website (reflected in the policy), and are a broad introduction and deal with the methodological or subject-matter issues of the discipline in sufficiently broad scope and are appropriate to students for whom this may be the only course taken in the discipline
- Standard Letter Grade
- Course is not repeatable
- May be cross-listed (controlling department responsible for maintenance and oversight)
- Offered on a Continuing and Regular Basis
- New courses: Minimum of once per year for the first three years
- Continuing courses: Offered at least once within three academic years (more frequently is preferred)
- Not a Special/Open Topics Course with Variable Content, with the exception of:
- Advanced Composition where demands of writing component remains stable across topics
- Not part of a sequence or, if part of a sequence, is complete in itself for students who do not take the entire sequence
- Advanced Composition: By special permission of the Gen Ed Board a two-course sequence may be certified as fulfilling the requirement, if the writing component of the sequence meets the standards specified for certification of a single course; credit will not be given for completing only one course in the sequence
- No prerequisites and appropriate for students at all levels including students for whom this may be the only course taken in the discipline, with the exceptions of courses approved in only the following areas:
- Advanced Composition: Courses either approved in the rhetoric and communication disciplines that build upon the Composition I requirement and have writing as their principal focus, or courses focused on writing in the disciplinary subject matter where students have completed previous coursework in the discipline
- Quantitative Reasoning II: May include courses that build upon and expand a prerequisite course taken to meet the Quantitative Reasoning I requirement
- Natural Sciences & Technology (Physical Sciences & Life Sciences): May have as a prerequisite a college course that presents the fundamentals of the science in the particular area
- Open to all audiences (unrestricted), with the exception of:
- Courses which have prerequisites (fall under exceptions above) where the course is restricted to students completing the prerequisite course
- Courses offering multiple sections where one or more sections are unrestricted and available to all students on a consistent and frequent basis
- Advanced Composition courses approved as discipline specific may be restricted to majors or students with previous knowledge in the subject-matter
- Instructional format is appropriate
- Number of lecture meetings, number of lab/discussion meetings, etc.
- In most instances Gen Ed guidelines will not be met by instruction with mass lectures as sole means of instruction
- Ratio of instructors responsible for teaching to expected student enrollment appropriate
- Adequate instructional staffing to provide students the appropriate graded feedback on their work necessary to meet the disciplinary thinking and communication skill development objectives of Gen Ed
- Advanced Composition ratio guidance provided in the category criteria below
- Satisfy only one General Education requirement, with the exception of the below categories may be approved:
- Advanced Composition
- Quantitative Reasoning II
- Cultural Studies: Western, Non-Western, or US Minority
- Courses only approved for one Cultural Studies area
Content Criteria
- Provides substantive, rigorous, and broad introductions to important theories, concepts, and methodologies in a particular field of study for students for whom this might be the only course taken in the discipline (i.e., non-majors) while also providing a meaningful introduction for majors/potential majors
- Advanced Composition courses that are writing in the discipline should be geared towards majors/minors. Reference report from Adv. Comp. working group
- Broadens students’ understanding of human thought and achievement
- Enhances critical and analytical thinking
CIM-C Questions
Syllabus/Syllabi (Upload)
Is the course specifically required for a major or a concentration?
Is the course part of a sequence?
What is the frequency with which the course will be offered?: (For Example: every semester, once a year)
Approval of this certification means that the proposing department is committed to offering the course on a continuing and regular basis (at least once every three years), and new Gen Ed courses must be taught a minimum of once per year for three years following approval. Please refer to the Inactive Course Information on the Gen Ed Website.
Briefly describe how the course fulfills the General Education objectives. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met
Objectives: Courses approved for general education are expected to provide substantive, rigorous, and broad introductions to important theories, concepts, and methodologies in a particular field of study that are appropriate for non majors; to broaden students’ understanding of human thought and achievement; and to enhance critical and analytical thinking.
The General Education Board considers the audience for and level of (100-400) the course when determining whether it is appropriate for General Education students. With the exception of Advanced Composition, courses that teach highly specialized knowledge, require extensive pre-existing knowledge of the subject area, are aimed primarily or exclusively at students in their junior or senior years, or meet with courses that are not general education in focus will likely not be approved.
Describe how the course will be intellectually challenging for majors as well as non-majors. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Instructional Format
Describe the instructional format and provide special justification, if necessary.
Departments are responsible for developing appropriate instructional formats for courses proposed for general education. The course format should not only be appropriate to the discipline and course content, but also should be consistent with the aims of general education. In most instances the goals of general education as set forth in the campus guidelines will not be met by instruction in mass lectures without discussion or laboratory sections.
What is the instructor-to-student ratio for the course? If the course utilizes multiple section types (e.g., has a lecture and discussion sections), please provide this ratio for each section type.
Communication Skills
Describe the means by which the Communication Skills goal will be achieved. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met:
Courses approved for general education are expected to have as an integral part of their design means that promote the development of students’ communication skills relevant to the area, its data, and methods. Briefly describe the means (e.g., written exams, papers, oral reports, projects) that address this goal. Courses designed to meet the Advanced Composition requirement should provide appropriately structured instructional support that will ensure students’ ability to draft, revise, and consult with the instructor(s) about their writing. Large lecture courses are not appropriate for the Advanced Composition requirement, nor are courses with higher than a 1:24 faculty-student ratio.
Guidelines, Evaluation & Teaching Assistants
Describe how evaluation and adherence to General Education guidelines will be monitored:
Please indicate the timeline for such evaluations. Departments offering courses for general education credit are responsible for assuring that the courses are taught in line with the guidelines for general education courses including syllabus requirements and that the courses and instruction are regularly evaluated by discipline-appropriate methods.
Indicate those who will teach the course and describe procedures for training & supervising teaching assistants:
All general education courses should be taught by faculty or under the direct responsibility of a tenure-track, tenured, or specialized faculty member. Where teaching assistants are utilized, appropriate means for preparing, supervising, and providing guidance to teaching assistants should be provided by an appropriate staff member. Undergraduate students should under no circumstances provide evaluation of enrolled students’ work, nor should they be hired as teaching assistants without significant and ongoing supervision by a full faculty member also involved in teaching the course.
Review Criteria
- Instructional format (number of lecture meetings, number of lab/discussion meetings, etc.) is appropriate.
- Ratio of instructors responsible for teaching to expected student enrollment is appropriate.
- Provides substantive, rigorous, and broad introductions to important theories, concepts, and methodologies in a particular field of study for students for whom this might be the only course taken in the discipline (i.e., non-majors) while also providing a meaningful introduction for majors/potential majors.
- Advanced Composition courses that are writing in the discipline should be geared towards majors/minors. Please reference report from Adv. Comp. working group: https://go.illinois.edu/GenEdAdvCompCriteria
- Is not part of a sequence or, if part of a sequence, is complete in itself for students who do not take the entire sequence.
- Offered on a continuing and regular basis.
- Broadens students’ understanding of human thought and achievement.
- Enhances critical and analytical thinking.
- As relevant to the area of study, emphasizes the student’s ability to communicate.
EP.17.74 Policy
Basic Requirements & Instructional Goals to be met by General Education
1.1 In addition to meeting the basic requirements and instructional goals set forth in this section, a course approved for General Education credit must meet the requirements of a specific General Education content area as set forth in Part II of this document.
1.2 General Education courses must strive to broaden students’ understanding of human thought and achievement, to provide them a richer context within which to understand their own fields, to develop their communication skills, and to enhance their critical thinking about the materials in the course.
1.3 General Education courses should be designed to give students an opportunity to gain understanding of how significant data in a particular discipline or area of study are collected and analyzed, and the theoretical underpinnings for these processes. Thus, General Education courses should focus on data and methods appropriate to the area.
1.4 General Education courses stress the importance of the students’ ability to communicate. Appropriate means of developing and assessing the students’ skills of communication relevant to the area, its data, and its methods should form a significant component of all General Education courses. Thus, where appropriate, General Education courses should include one or more of the following as graded exercises: writing assignments, moderated discussion, oral presentations, visual or artistic expression, or written exercises involving mathematical or other modes of formal symbolic expression.
1.5 General Education courses should introduce students to the theories, concepts, and methods of the discipline, but should be more than superficial introductions. They should strive to present their content in appropriate ways to students for whom this may be the only course taken in the discipline. At the same time, they should provide majors and potential majors in the discipline a meaningful introduction. In some disciplines, the same course might serve both for General Education and as an introductory course for the majors in those fields; in other disciplines; distinct courses might be indicated for these purposes.
1.6 General Education courses should deal broadly with the discipline or subject matter; in most instances, courses that concern narrowly focused topics or cover only a small sub-area of the discipline or field are not appropriate for General Education. Usually, General Education courses will be 100- or 200-level courses; however, an upper-level course may be approved for meeting the General Education requirement if the course deals with the methodological or subject-matter issues of the discipline in sufficiently broad scope. In some instances the same course may fulfill the requirements for a major or a minor and for General Education.
1.7 Where appropriate, General Education courses should help students become familiar with scholarship on the significance of women and gender. Material drawn from this scholarship should be an integral part of a substantial number of General Education courses. To assure the effective implementation of this guideline the General Education Board will work with departments, colleges, and the campus administration to assure that there are adequate instructional development vehicles (workshops, seminars, course development funds, etc.) to aid the faculty in integrating the significant and increasingly visible scholarship about women and gender into General Education courses.
1.8 Individual courses will be approved to satisfy only one General Education requirement except as follows. Exceptions are the Advanced Composition, Quantitative Reasoning II, and the Cultural Studies requirements.
1.9 Courses approved for General Education should be for at least three hours credit, and classes should meet for at least three hours a week.
1.10 Although courses may form part of a sequence, the first course of such a sequence should be complete in itself, so that the students’ understanding of the subject is not unduly limited if they do not take the second-level course.
1.1 Courses with variable content (open topic courses such as 199 and 299) will not be approved as General Education courses except in the case of the Advanced Composition requirement where the demands of the writing component of the course remains stable across variable topics
Expectations for Offering, Staffing, and Evaluating General Education Courses
2.1 General Education courses should be offered on a continuing and regular basis, though they need not be offered every year. Once approved, departments must agree to offer a General Education course for a minimum of three years on a regular basis (e.g., every semester or once a year).
2.2 Courses approved for General Education credit will be thoroughly reviewed and reapproved or disapproved on a regular basis as is determined to be the minimal amount of time feasible for careful reviews by General Education Board members.
2.3 A department offering an approved General Education course is responsible for assuring that the course is taught in line with the guidelines for General Education courses as summarized in the proposal seeking certification of the course for General Education credit. In pursuit of this goal, departments must have clear procedures for informing instructors about the guidelines and the certification proposal.
2.4 Responsibility for a General Education course rests with the department and normally should be exercised by a tenure-track, tenured, or specialized faculty member. Teaching assistants may teach General Education courses, including autonomous sections, under the close and regular supervision of an appropriate staff member.
2.5 Departments offering General Education courses have responsibility for developing appropriate means for preparing, supervising, and providing guidance to teaching assistants assigned to General Education courses.
2.6 Departments are responsible for assuring adequate staffing of General Education courses to be able to provide students the appropriate graded feedback on their work necessary to meet the disciplinary thinking and communication skill development objectives of General Education, as outlined in 1.4 above.
2.7 Departments are responsible for assuring that there is appropriate and thorough evaluation of instruction in all courses approved for General Education. To assure the ongoing improvement of their General Education courses, departments are encouraged to develop and regularly employ discipline-appropriate methods of assessing instructional quality that include both peer review and student evaluations.
2.8 Departments are responsible for developing appropriate instructional formats for courses proposed for General Education. The course format should not only be appropriate to the discipline and course content, but also should be consistent with the aims of General Education. In most instances the goals of General Education as set forth in these guidelines will not be met by instruction with mass lectures as the sole means of delivering instruction.
Perspectives on Women and Gender
EP.17.74 mandates that material drawn from the scholarship in the various fields of inquiry on the significance of women and gender be made an integral part of a substantial number of General Education courses.
CIM-C Question
Please explain how the course meets the perspectives on women and gender requirement. See the General Education Board’s current interpretation for more information on how this requirement can be met.
See the General Education Board’s current interpretation for more information on how the perspectives on women and gender requirement can be met.
Review Criteria
- Satisfies the perspectives on women and gender requirement.
- Please reference report from College Workshops working group https://go.illinois.edu/GenEdWomenGenderCriteria for paths of how this requirement can be met.
Resources
View Suggestions and tips for integrating perspectives on women and gender in Gen Ed courses (created by the Gen Ed Board Working Group)
EP.17.74 Policy
The Senate has directed that material drawn from the scholarship in the various fields of inquiry on the significance of women and gender be made an integral part of a substantial number of General Education courses. Attention to such materials is important both to enhance students’ awareness of the contributions made by women in scientific, artistic, political, economic, and intellectual arenas and to further understanding of the changing and dynamic nature of gender roles and relationships in contemporary society.
8.1 The general guidelines detailed above applying to all General Education courses state that “where appropriate, General Education courses should help students become familiar with scholarship on the significance of women and gender. Material drawn from this scholarship should be an integral part of a substantial number of General Education courses.” Departments must take special care to assure that appropriate attention is given to scholarship concerning women and gender issues in courses proposed for General Education approval.
8.2 Departments are also encouraged to develop courses for General Education credit that focus directly upon women and gender issues. Courses should be available that explore such issues from a variety of perspectives (historical, economic, social, cultural, etc.).
8.3 As a means of expanding students’ exposure to the contribution of women in the various disciplines, faculty proposing courses should give attention to assuring that appropriate scholarship by women is included in courses proposed for General Education credit.
8.4 As was noted in the general guidelines above, the General Education Board will work with departments, colleges, and campus administration to assure that there are adequate instructional development vehicles (workshops, seminars, course development funds, etc.) to aid the faculty in integrating the significant and increasingly visible scholarship about women and gender into General Education courses.
Guidelines for Courses in Specific Content Area/Category
Gen Ed category includes .
Gen Ed Category Abbreviation Guide
Gen Ed courses may be listed with various category abbreviations on campus websites and reports. Click below to expand the Gen Ed Abbreviations Guide.
Gen Ed Abbreviations
Gen Ed Category | Abbreviation |
---|---|
Composition I | FC1 or UCI and/or UCII |
Advanced Composition | CLL or 1CLL or ACP or 1ACP |
Humanities & the Arts | HUM or 1HUM |
Literature and the Arts | LA or 1LA |
Historical and Philosophical Perspectives | HP or 1HP |
Natural Sciences & Technology | NAT or 1NAT |
Physical Sciences | PS or 1PS |
Life Sciences | LS or 1LS |
Social & Behavioral Sciences | SBS or 1SBS |
Social Sciences | SS or 1SS |
Behavioral Sciences | BSC or 1BSC |
Cultural Studies | CS or 1CS |
Non-Western | NW or 1NW |
US Minority Cultures | US or 1US |
Western/Comparative Cultures | WCC or 1WCC |
Quantitative Reasoning | QR |
Quantitative Reasoning I | QRI or QR1 |
Quantitative Reasoning II | QRII or QR2 |
Language Other Than English | LOTE |
English Composition
Each student must fulfill a two-part requirement, which is designated here as Composition I and Advanced Composition (formerly Composition II).
Composition I
FC1 or UCI and/or UCII
CIM-C Questions
Show that the course has instruction in writing as its primary emphasis, includes a full semester (or equivalent) of weekly writing assignments, and includes primarily multi-draft writing assignments. What provision does the course make for careful evaluation of writing assignments? Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
What strategies does the course use to emphasize critical thinking and to strengthen development of students’ ideas, clarity of expression, and organization along with their basic writing skills? Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
EP.17.74 Policy
1.1.1 The Composition I course requirement may be met by satisfactory completion of an approved course, taken at an appropriate skill level, in Rhetoric, Communication, or English as an International Second Language.
1.1.2 Courses approved as meeting the Composition I requirement should be (a) courses that have instruction in writing as a primary emphasis; (b) include a full semester (or equivalent) of frequent and regular (e.g., weekly) writing assignments; (c) emphasize critical thinking, development of ideas, clarity of expression, and organization in addition to correct grammar, spelling, and formal writing structure; (d) emphasize multi-draft writing assignments; and (e) involve rigorous evaluation of writing assignments.
1.1.3 Courses approved for Composition I must have extensive and well-conceived systems for the preparation and ongoing supervision of teaching assistants. This should include a carefully designed and substantial orientation program and/or in- service education program for new teaching assistants assigned to the course. There should be substantial faculty participation in the Composition I courses, including classroom instruction and, most importantly, significant and sustained involvement in guiding the instructional work of teaching assistants assigned to the courses.
1.1.4 Courses approved for Composition I should be taught with section sizes consistent with the goal of promoting development of writing through directed rewriting following careful evaluation.
Advanced Composition
CLL or 1CLL or ACP or 1ACP
CIM-C Questions
Into which of the following categories does this course fall?
(a) Rhetoric or communication course building on Composition I
(b) a General Education course in another area having a substantial writing component
(c) a required or elective course in a major or minor field of study
How does this course use writing assignments to facilitate analysis and synthesis of the subject matter of the course, or in the case of writing courses in the rhetoric and communication disciplines, application of the principles under study? Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
What strategies does the course use to require substantial original composition (typically totaling at least 20 to 30 pages) over the course of the semester, including directed rewriting following careful evaluation? Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Show that the course is taught in section sizes consistent with the goals of students’ receiving thoughtful appraisal of their writing and a substantial portion of the course grade being based upon evaluation of written work. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Refer to the Gen Ed Board Subcommittee Reports on ‘Advanced Composition Requirement Interpretation’
Review Criteria
- The course facilitates analysis and synthesis of the subject matter, or, in the case of writing courses in rhetoric/communication, application of the principles under study.
- The course requires substantial original composition of at least 20-30 written pages over the semester.
- Compositional assignments should total 20-30 written pages, with a page representing ~250 words, for at least ~5,000–7,500 words over the semester.
- Only final submissions are counted toward the total course page count.
- At least 50% of the total writing assignments (a minimum of 10 pages) should be completed by individual students.
- Group assignments are welcomed but must total at most 50% of the graded assignments. Details on how instructors will assess contributions to group assignments are required.
- The course involves multiple drafts as graded exercises over the semester.
- At least one of the individual assignments should be a single composition totaling at least 2,000 words (~5 pages), developed with at least two graded drafts (drafts are not included in the total page count) and focused on writing quality (see below).
- A substantial portion of the overall course grade is based upon evaluation of the quality of written assignments.
- Quality of writing refers to intellectual understanding and contribution, grammatical correctness, and clarity of ideas. It should be documented and demonstrated through drafts and in all final assignments. The final course grade should reflect a substantial focus (minimum 50%) on writing quality for individual assignments.
- Assignment/Written quality should document: critical thinking ability; exhibit skills in the assessment of evidence; display a mastery of essay structure; prove abilities in the use of formal references and citations; develop abilities in identifying plagiarism; indicate the ability to write clearly
- The Center for Writing Studies is available to support proposing units, instructors, and students.
- Student-instructor ratio permits the thoughtful appraisal of written assignments.
- Large lecture courses are not appropriate for the Advanced Composition requirement, nor are courses with higher than a 1:24 instructor-student ratio.
Refer to the Gen Ed Board Subcommittee Reports on ‘Advanced Composition Requirement Interpretation’
EP.17.74 Policy
1.2.1 The Advanced Composition requirement is met by completing an approved writing-intensive course. This requirement will normally be completed on the Urbana campus. Courses taken elsewhere must be individually evaluated and substantial documentation of the writing component provided if they are to satisfy the requirement.
1.2.2 Approved Advanced Composition courses may be in any department on the Campus, and will fall into one of three categories: (a) approved courses in the rhetoric and communication disciplines that build upon the Composition I requirement and have writing as their principal focus; (b) approved courses meeting another area of the General Education requirements that have a substantial writing component; and (c) approved courses meeting requirements within a major, minor, or elective field of study that are designed to require and enhance writing in the disciplinary subject matter. All departments are strongly encouraged to develop writing-intensive courses. Departmental undertakings in this area will be supported by the campus-wide Center for Writing Studies.
1.2.3 Approved courses meeting the Advanced Composition requirement can be at any level.
1.2.4 Courses approved to meet the Advanced Composition requirement must involve writing assignments that (a) demand analysis and synthesis of the subject matter of the course, or in the case of writing courses in the rhetoric and communication disciplines, application of the principles under study; (b) require substantial original composition (typically totaling at least 20 to 30 pages over the course of a semester); and (c) involve multiple drafts as graded exercises throughout the course of the semester. By special permission of the General Education Board a two-course sequence may be certified as fulfilling the Advanced Composition requirement, if the writing component of the sequence meets the standards specified for certification of a single course; credit for Advanced Composition will not be given for completing only one course in the sequence.
1.2.5 The student-instructor ratio in courses approved to meet the Advanced Composition requirement should permit the thoughtful appraisal of written assignments. A substantial portion of the overall course grade should be based upon evaluation of the quality of written assignments.
Quantitative Reasoning
Each student must fulfill a two-part Quantitative Reasoning requirement, designated Quantitative Reasoning I and II.
QR
Must fulfill the criteria from one of the subcategories: Quantitative Reasoning I, or Quantitative Reasoning II
Quantitative Reasoning I
QRI or QR1
CIM-C Questions
Which type of course is this? (Mathematics; Computer Science; Symbolic Logic; Probability or Statistics)
Mathematics:
Show that the course is a either a calculus course, or a mathematics course for which calculus is a prerequisite, or a college-level mathematics course emphasizing logical thought processes as opposed to memorization or manipulation of mathematical formulas. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
How does the course teach clear organization and exposition of mathematical thought? Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Computer Science:
Show that the course involves problem formulation, algorithm development, and a significant amount of coding of programs. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
What field of computer applications is addressed in the course?
Symbolic Logic:
How does the course emphasize the algebra of symbolic and scientific reasoning, and introduce the techniques of formal logics, including truth-fundamental logic and quantification theory, methods for the valuation of scientific evidence, and the use of scientific information in decision making? Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
How does the course teach the student the translation of verbal arguments into their symbolic counterparts, the manipulation of symbols, and the translation of word problems into their symbolic representations? Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Probability or Statistics:
How does the course emphasize the relationships between the assumptions of the probabilistic and statistical models discussed and the conclusions drawn? Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
What strategy is employed to assure that students will understand when particular models are appropriate or inappropriate? Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Review Criteria
MATHEMATICS courses:
- Is a calculus course or a mathematics course for which calculus is a prerequisite or a mathematics course emphasizing logical thought processes (rather than memorization or manipulation of mathematical formulas).
- For mathematics courses emphasizing logical thought processes, teaches clear organization and exposition of mathematical thought.
COMPUTER SCIENCE courses:
- Emphasizes problem formulation and algorithm development.
- Uses programming (note which programming language(s) used) to an appropriate extent.
- Uses computer programs to solve applied problems (note into which field(s) programs are applied).
PROBABILITY & STATISTICS courses:
- Emphasizes the relationships between the assumptions of the probabilistic and statistical models presented and the conclusions drawn.
- Requires students to understand appropriate application of particular models.
SYMBOLIC LOGIC courses:
- Emphasizes symbolic logic to an appropriate extent.
- Emphasizes scientific reasoning to an appropriate extent.
EP.17.74
To fulfill the Quantitative Reasoning I requirement the student must receive credit for at least one college-level course in mathematics, computer science, statistics, or formal logic. Guidelines for courses meeting the Quantitative Reasoning I requirement in each of these areas are detailed below.
2.1.1 Completion of the Quantitative Reasoning I requirement with a college-level course in mathematics shall involve one of the following: (a) a course in calculus or a mathematics course for which calculus is prerequisite; (b) an approved course in mathematics which emphasizes that mathematics involves logical thought processes and places little emphasis upon memorization and manipulation of mathematical formulas.
Clear organization and exposition of mathematical thought is to be expected throughout a course in Category (b). For instance, such a course might expose the student to the process of formulating conjectures on the basis of the study of examples, followed in elementary situations by finding proofs of the conjectures. A course in Category (b) should not cover primarily material included in high school courses in algebra, geometry, and trigonometry used to meet the Campus entrance requirements.
2.1.2 Courses in computer science approved as meeting the Quantitative Reasoning I requirement must involve problem formulation, algorithm development, a significant amount of coding in a programming language, and the application of computer programs to the solution of problems in one or more fields, including, for example, agriculture, education, engineering, natural science, social science, business, and/or architecture.
2.1.3 The Quantitative Reasoning I requirement may be met by a course in probability and statistics. Approved courses should emphasize the relationships between the assumptions of the probabilistic and statistical models presented and the conclusions drawn. The course(s) should not be primarily “cookbook” in nature and must require that students understand when it is appropriate and inappropriate to apply particular models.
2.1.4 The Quantitative Reasoning I requirement may be met by any course in philosophy that emphasizes the forms and methods of symbolic logic and scientific reasoning. The course must introduce students to the techniques of formal logic, including truth-functional logic and quantification theory; methods for the evaluation of scientific evidence; and the use of scientific information in decision making. Such course(s) must (a) teach the student how to translate verbal arguments into their symbolic counterparts; (b) cover the relationships between premises and conclusions, and thus foster logical thinking; and (c) involve the manipulation of symbols.
Quantitative Reasoning II
QRII or QR2
CIM-C Questions
Which type of course is this? (Mathematics; Computer Science; Symbolic Logic; Probability or Statistics)
Mathematics:
If the course incorporates mathematics show how at least 25 percent of the course content and graded material incorporates either calculus, or mathematics for which calculus is a prerequisite, or college-level mathematics emphasizing logical thought processes as opposed to memorization or manipulation of mathematical formulas. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Computer Science:
Show how at least 25 percent of the course content and graded material incorporates problem formulation, algorithm development, and a significant amount of coding of programs. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Symbolic Logic:
Show how at least 25 percent of the course content and graded material incorporates the algebra of symbolic and scientific reasoning, and introduces the techniques of formal logics, including truth-fundamental logic and quantification theory, methods for the valuation of scientific evidence, and the use of scientific information in decision making. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Probability or Statistics:
Show how at least 25 percent of the course content and graded material incorporates the relationships between the assumptions of the probabilistic and statistical models discussed and the conclusions drawn. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Review Criteria
- Requires the use of mathematics, computer science, probability and statistics, or symbolic logic consistent with Quantitative Reasoning I guidelines in at least 25% of graded material.
MATHEMATICS courses:
- Course content and graded material incorporates either calculus, mathematics for which calculus is a prerequisite, or mathematics emphasizing logical thought processes (rather than memorization or manipulation of mathematical formulas).
- For mathematics courses emphasizing logical thought processes, teaches clear organization and exposition of mathematical thought.
COMPUTER SCIENCE courses:
- Emphasizes problem formulation and algorithm development.
- Uses programming (note which programming language(s) used) to an appropriate extent.
- Uses computer programs to solve applied problems (note into which field(s) programs are applied).
PROBABILITY & STATISTICS courses:
- Emphasizes the relationships between the assumptions of the probabilistic and statistical models presented and the conclusions drawn.
- Requires students to understand appropriate application of particular models.
SYMBOLIC LOGIC courses:
- Emphasizes symbolic logic to an appropriate extent.
- Emphasizes scientific reasoning to an appropriate extent.
EP.17.74
The Quantitative Reasoning II requirement may be met in any one of the three following ways.
2.2.1 The Quantitative Reasoning II requirement can be satisfied by completing a second course that has been approved to satisfy the Quantitative Reasoning I requirement.
2.2.2 The Quantitative Reasoning II requirement can be met by completing a course from the areas of mathematics, computer science, statistics, or formal logic that builds upon and expands a prerequisite course taken to meet the Quantitative Reasoning I requirement.
2.2.3 The Quantitative Reasoning II requirement can be met by an approved course in any department at the 100, 200 or 300- level in which at least 25 percent of the course material and graded material require the use of mathematics, computer science, probability and statistics, or symbolic logic consistent with the Quantitative Reasoning II guidelines, as described below.
2.2.3.a. The Quantitative Reasoning II requirement may be met by a course that incorporates mathematics. The course should include one of the following: (a) the use of calculus or mathematics for which calculus is a prerequisite; (b) mathematics which involves logical thought processes and places little emphasis on memorization and manipulation of mathematical formulas. Clear organization and exposition of mathematical thought is to be expected in a course in Category (b). A course in Category (b) should not cover, but may be based on, material included in high school courses in algebra, geometry, and trigonometry used to meet the Campus’ entrance requirements.
2.2.3.b. The Quantitative Reasoning II requirement may be met by a course that incorporates the following computer science principles: problem formulation; algorithm development; coding in a programming language; and the application of computer programs to the solution of problems.
2.2.3.c. The Quantitative Reasoning II requirement may be met by a course that incorporates probability and statistics. Approved courses should emphasize the relationships between the assumptions of the probabilistic and statistical models presented and the conclusions drawn. The material should not be primarily “cookbook” in nature and must require that students understand when it is appropriate and inappropriate to apply particular models.
2.2.3.d. The Quantitative Reasoning II requirement may be met by any course that incorporates philosophy which emphasizes the forms and methods of symbolic logic and scientific reasoning including: formal logic, including truth- functional logic and quantification theory; methods for the evaluation of scientific evidence; and the use of scientific information in decision making. The material must: (a) include the translation of verbal arguments into their symbolic counterparts (b) cover the relationships between premises and conclusions, and thus foster critical thinking; and (c) involve the manipulation of symbols.
Natural Sciences and Technology
Each student must satisfactorily complete at least nine six credit hours of approved coursework in the Natural Sciences and Technology. Guidelines for all Natural Sciences and Technology as well as the two subcategories of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Technology follow.
NAT or 1NAT
Must fulfill the criteria from one of the subcategories: Physical Sciences, or Life Sciences
EP.17.74
4.3 Courses that are approved for General Education credit in the Natural Sciences and Technology category may focus primarily on technology and its application to the Natural Sciences. However, these courses must be submitted for approval in either the Physical Sciences or Life Sciences and satisfy the requirements listed above. Courses with an emphasis on technological application (a) should emphasize the applications of the sciences to the solution of human and societal problems; (b) should be comprehensive enough to give a broad perspective on the implications of technology to society; and, (c) should emphasize the problem-solving nature of technology by involving the student in such activities rather than being simply descriptive and requiring only memorization of facts.
Physical Sciences (Natural Sciences and Technology)
PS or 1PS
CIM-C Questions
Does this course focus primarily on technology and its application to the natural sciences?
Briefly describe how the course presents the fundamentals of the science or has as a prerequisite a college course in the fundamentals of the science. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Briefly describe how the course emphasizes the scientific method, including making observations, evaluating data, and solving problems. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
If Selected “Yes” for Technology, the below questions will also appear:
Briefly describe how the course emphasizes the applications of the sciences to the solution of human and societal problems. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Briefly describe how the course is comprehensive enough to give a broad perspective on the implication of technology to society. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Briefly describe how the course emphasizes the problem-solving nature of technology by involving the student in such activities rather than simply being descriptive and requiring only memorization of facts. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Review Criteria
- Is introductory in nature and presents (or has as a prerequisite a college course that presents) the fundamentals of the physical science.
- Emphasizes scientific methodology by involving the student in making observations, evaluating data, and solving problems.
If also seeking approval as a technology course:
- Emphasizes the applications of the sciences to the solution of human and societal problems.
- Is comprehensive enough to give a broad perspective on the implications of technology to society.
- Emphasizes the problem-solving nature of technology by involving the student in such activities rather than being simply descriptive and requiring only memorization of facts.
EP.17.74
4.1 To be approved for General Education credit, a course in the Physical Sciences (a) must be introductory in nature and present (or have as a prerequisite a college course that presents) the fundamentals of the physical science; and (b) should emphasize scientific methodology by involving the student in making observations, evaluating data, and solving problems. The course may be one required for majors in the physical sciences and technology or a course designed for non-specialists; courses designed for non-specialists should include coverage of the relationship of the physical science to human and environmental problems.
Life Sciences (Natural Sciences and Technology)
LS or 1LS
CIM-C Questions
Does this course focus primarily on technology and its application to the natural sciences?
Briefly describe how the course presents the fundamentals of the science or has as a prerequisite a college course in the fundamentals of the science. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Briefly describe how the course emphasizes the scientific method, including how it incorporates making observations, evaluating data, and solving problems. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
If Selected “Yes” for Technology, the below questions will also appear:
Briefly describe how the course emphasizes the applications of the sciences to the solution of human and societal problems. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Briefly describe how the course is comprehensive enough to give a broad perspective on the implication of technology to society. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Briefly describe how the course emphasizes the problem-solving nature of technology by involving the student in such activities rather than simply being descriptive and requiring only memorization of facts. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Review Criteria
- Is introductory in nature and presents (or has as a prerequisite a college course that presents) the fundamentals of the life science, including genetics/speciation/evolution, growth/differentiation, metabolism/bio-energetics and ecology/ethology.
- Emphasizes scientific methodology by involving the student in making observations, evaluating data, and solving problems.
If also seeking approval as a technology course:
- Emphasizes the applications of the sciences to the solution of human and societal problems.
- Is comprehensive enough to give a broad perspective on the implications of technology to society.
- Emphasizes the problem-solving nature of technology by involving the student in such activities rather than being simply descriptive and requiring only memorization of facts.
EP.17.74
4.2 To be approved for General Education credit, a course in the Life Sciences (a) must be an introductory course which presents (or has as a prerequisite a college course that presents) the fundamentals of biological science, including genetics/speciation/evolution, growth/differentiation, metabolism/bio-energetics and ecology/ethology; and (b) should emphasize scientific methodology by involving the student in making observations, evaluating data, and solving problems. The course may be one required for majors in the life sciences and technology or a course designed for non-specialists; courses designed for non-specialists should include coverage of the relationship of the life sciences to human and environmental problems. Introductory courses for majors in the life sciences that do not cover all the topics specified under (a) above may be certified for General Education credit by special permission of the General Education Board.
Humanities and the Arts
Each student must satisfactorily complete at least six credit hours of approved coursework in the humanities and the arts. It is recommended that one course be from an approved list of courses in literature and the arts and the other from an approved list of courses in historical and philosophical perspectives.
HUM or 1HUM
Must fulfill the criteria from one of the subcategories: Literature and the Arts, or Historical and Philosophical Perspectives
EP.17.74 Policy
5.1 The Humanities and the Arts are those studies which foster skill in communication; discriminating judgment and the appreciation of ideas; an understanding of human cultural traditions; an appreciation of cultural, ethnic and national diversity; conceptions of literary, artistic, philosophical or historical criticism; and reflection on goals for human life. All courses approved for General Education credit in the Humanities and the Arts should fulfill these goals by (a) introducing students to the typical critical approaches and methods utilized in the discipline and to past accomplishments in the field; (b) relying substantially on primary texts and sources; (c) requiring substantial writing; and (d) approaching their subjects in ways that would be intellectually challenging for majors as well as non-specialists.
Literature and the Arts
LA or 1LA
CIM-C Questions
Is this course in literature or the arts?
Describe the reading requirements in this course and how they rely substantially on primary texts and sources. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Describe the writing requirements in this course. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
How does the course introduce students to the typical critical approaches and methods of the discipline, and to past accomplishments in the field? Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
How does the course foster the goals of humanistic study, including: skill in communication; discriminating judgment and appreciation of ideas; understanding of cultural traditions; appreciation awareness of cultural ethnic and national diversity; and reflection on the human condition? Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
If the course contains elements of more than one category within the Humanities and the Arts (literature, the arts, historical perspectives, or philosophical perspectives), explain why this course is more appropriate for the category for which it is proposed. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Literature:
Show that the course gives significant consideration to the aesthetic characteristics and the formal aspects of the works studied. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
What aspects of literature will this course emphasize? They may include authorship, audience, cultural attitudes or values, specific themes, stylistic and generic features, historical, socio-political and/or philosophical issues. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Arts:
List or describe the art forms, genres or specific objects to be studied. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
How will the course concern itself with the characteristics of the medium and other appropriate issues, such as its social function, its means of conveying meaning, and the evaluation of the art forms? Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Review Criteria
- Introduces students to the typical critical approaches and methods of the discipline, and to past accomplishments in the field.
- Fosters the goals of humanistic study, including skills in communication; discriminating judgment and appreciation of ideas; understanding of cultural traditions; appreciation and awareness of cultural, ethnic, and national diversity; and reflection on the human condition.
- Relies substantially on primary texts and sources.
- Requires substantial writing.
- Intellectually challenging for majors as well as non-specialists.
Courses in Literature:
- Involves significant consideration to the aesthetic characteristics and formal aspects of the works studied.
- Addresses appropriate issues concerning the work’s authorship; audience; cultural attitudes or values; themes; stylistic and generic features; historical, socio-political, and/or philosophical issues.
Courses in the Arts:
- Studies art forms produced through written arts, music, architecture, dance, theatre, painting, sculpture, or other visual arts.
- Addresses appropriate issues concerning the characteristics of the medium.
- Addresses basic questions such as the social function of the art form, its means of conveying meaning, and how it and other art forms are to be evaluated.
EP.17.74 Policy
5.2 Courses in literature approved for General Education credit (a) should involve study of texts, in prose or verse, that have exemplary style and express themes of more than temporary value; and (b) should address appropriate issues concerning the work’s author, structure and content, language and style, 261 historical context and audience, and expressed and implied cultural attitudes and values.
5.3 Courses in the arts approved for General Education credit (a) will study the art forms produced through the written arts, music, architecture, dance, theatre, painting, sculpture, other visual arts; (b) will address appropriate issues concerning the characteristics and essential qualities of the medium; (c) and will address such basic questions as the social function of the art form, its means of conveying meaning, and how it and other art forms are to be evaluated. Courses in the arts approved for General Education credit may involve the student in the experience of the actual doing of the art; to be approved for General Education credit, such courses must meet both the general criteria for all Humanities and the Arts courses as well as those detailed in this paragraph for courses in the arts.
Historical and Philosophical Perspectives
HP or 1HP
CIM-C Questions
Is this course in historical perspectives or philosophical perspectives?
Describe the reading requirements in this course and how they rely substantially on primary texts and sources. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Describe the writing requirements in this course. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
How does the course introduce students to the typical critical approaches and methods of the discipline, and to past accomplishments in the field? Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
How does the course foster the goals of humanistic study, including: skill in communication; discriminating judgment and appreciation of ideas; understanding of cultural traditions; appreciation awareness of cultural ethnic and national diversity; and reflection on the human condition? Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
If the course contains elements of more than one category within the Humanities and the Arts (literature, the arts, historical perspectives, or philosophical perspectives), explain why this course is more appropriate for the category for which it is proposed. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Historical Perspectives:
What chronological and/or geographical aspect of human history is studied in this course? Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Show how the course addresses continuity and change in the human experience and elucidates the development of institutions, ideas, beliefs, and social structures. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Show how the course familiarizes students with significant movements, persons, and events in their intellectual, social, economic, and political contexts. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Philosophical Perspectives:
How does the course offer a critical inquiry into problems of human thought, value, or existence, and engage students in the study of philosophical issues? Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Show how the course involves either (i) study of philosophical works presenting perspectives on recurring intellectual, cultural, or social issues and problems, or (ii) study of an important institution, discipline or practice (e.g., law, religion, art, reasoning, science) that explores its place in life generally, its relation to other endeavors, and its claim to importance. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Review Criteria
- Introduces students to the typical critical approaches and methods of the discipline, and to past accomplishments in the field.
- Fosters the goals of humanistic study, including skills in communication; discriminating judgment and appreciation of ideas; understanding of cultural traditions; appreciation and awareness of cultural, ethnic, and national diversity; and reflection on the human condition.
- Relies substantially on primary texts and sources.
- Requires substantial writing.
- Intellectually challenging for majors as well as non-specialists.
Courses in Historical Perspectives:
- Addresses continuity and change in the human experience, elucidates how human institutions, ideas, beliefs, and social structures have developed.
- Surveys a broad chronological and/or geographic aspect of human history.
- Familiarizes students with significant movements, persons, and events in their intellectual, social, economic, and political contexts.
Courses in Philosophical Perspectives:
- Provides critical inquiry into problems of human thought, value, or existence.
- Engages students in the critical and/or historical study of philosophical issues.
- Involves either:
- Attention to philosophical works presenting perspectives on recurring intellectual, cultural, or social issues and problems; or
- Study of an important institution, discipline, or practice that explores its place in life generally, its relation to other endeavors, and its claim to importance
EP.17.74
5.4 Courses presenting a historical perspective for General Education credit (a) should attend to questions of continuity in human experience and elucidate how human institutions, ideas, beliefs, and social structures have developed; (b) should facilitate individuals’ understanding of who they are and how their society came to be by promoting a fuller cognizance of human traditions; (c) should foster a “sense of the past” that allows individuals to learn from the successes and failures of their predecessors; and (d) should nurture social sensitivity and lessen provincialism. Courses with a historical perspective that are approved for General Education credit should (a) purse these goals by surveying a broad chronological and/or geographic aspect of human history; and (b) combat present-mindedness and deficiencies in historical knowledge by familiarizing students with significant movements, persons and events in their intellectual, social, economic, and political contexts.
5.5 Courses presenting a philosophical perspective for General Education credit (a) should involve critical inquiry into problems of human thought, value, or existence; (b) should engage students in the critical and/or historical study of philosophical issues; and (c) should involve either (i) attention to contemporary philosophical works presenting different perspectives on recurring intellectual, cultural, or social issues and problems; or (ii) study of an important institution, discipline or practice (e.g., law, religion, art, reasoning, science) that explores its place in life generally, its relation to others endeavors, and its claim to importance.
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Each student will satisfactorily complete at least six credit hours of approved coursework in the social and behavioral sciences. It is recommended that one course be from an approved list of courses in social sciences and the other course from an approved list of courses in behavioral sciences.
SBS or 1SBS
Must fulfill the criteria from one of the subcategories: Social Sciences, or Behavioral Sciences
EP.17.74
6.3 For courses that might involve some crossover between the Social Sciences and the Behavioral Sciences or between the Social Sciences and the Humanities, departments are responsible for proposing and defending courses as appropriate candidates for a particular General Education category.
Social Sciences
SS or 1SS
CIM-C Questions
If the course contains elements of both the Social Sciences and the Behavioral Sciences categories, show how the emphasis of the course makes it most appropriate for the Social Sciences category for which it is being proposed. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
What social groups, institutions, organizations, or processes are studied in this course? What is the chronological, geographical, or cultural area within the scope of the course? Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Show how the course emphasizes persons in relation to other persons and to their environment. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Show how the course considers both methodological and substantive issues, and formulates and inquires into basic questions about the nature of social life. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Review Criteria
- Addresses methodological issues related to social/behavioral science.
Courses in Social Science:
- Provides opportunities for studying social groups, institutions, and organizations in their context.
- Has primary emphasis upon persons in relation to others and their environment.
- Formulates basic questions and inquiry about the nature of social life through both interpretive and systematic analyses.
- Addresses a broad area, chronologically, geographically, or culturally.
- Reflects concern for both methodological and substantive issues.
EP.17.74
6.1 To be approved for General Education credit, a Social Science course (a) should provide opportunities for studying social groups, institutions, and organizations, and their context; (b) should have a primary emphasis upon persons in relation to others and their environment; (c) should formulate basic questions and inquiry about the nature of social life through both interpretive and systematic analyses; (d) should address a broad area, chronologically, geographically or culturally; and (e) should reflect concern both for methodological and substantive issues.
Behavioral Sciences
BSC or 1BSC
CIM-C Questions
If the course contains elements of both the Social Sciences and the Behavioral Sciences categories, show how the emphasis of the course makes it most appropriate for the Behavioral Sciences category for which it is being proposed. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Show how the course studies human behavior in an empirical approach. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Discuss the attention given in the course to the general issues and the methods of the behavioral sciences. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Review Criteria
- Addresses methodological issues related to social/behavioral science.
Courses in Behavioral Science
- Concerns the empirical approach to the study of human behavior.
- Is broadly conceived.
- Gives appropriate attention to both the general issues and methods of the behavioral sciences.
EP.17.74
6.2 To be approved for General Education credit, a Behavioral Science course (a) should concern the empirical approach to the study of human behavior; (b) should be broadly conceived; and (c) should give appropriate attention to both the general issues and methods of the behavioral sciences.
Cultural Studies
Each student must obtain General Education credit for three courses (at least nine hours) approved for satisfaction of the Cultural Studies requirement. One of these must be approved and designated as concentrating on Western culture, one on non-Western culture, and one on U.S. Minority culture. These courses may fulfill other curricular requirements, but no single course can fulfill multiple Cultural Studies categories.
CS or 1CS
Must fulfill the criteria from one of the subcategories: Western Culture, or Non-Western Culture, or U.S. Minority Culture
EP.17.74
7.1 Courses approved as meeting the Cultural Studies requirement (a) should be concerned broadly with culture understood as the interaction among the intellectual, artistic, political, economic, and social aspects of a society or other cultural grouping; (b) should treat topics and issues that can be expected to promote a deepened understanding of the culture(s) focused upon; and (c) provide either (i) a broad description and analysis of the interaction of intellectual, artistic, political, economic, social, and other aspects of a society’s cultural life; (ii) an intensive investigation of the cultural life of a society or group in a particular time and place; (iii) a focused investigation of particular aspects of a society’s or group’s culture (e.g., its art, literature, and music); or (iv) a comparative investigation of cultural systems and the development of constructs for cross-cultural sensitivity and analysis.
Western Culture
WCC or 1WCC
CIM-C Questions
Show how the course treats topics and issues that promote a deeper understanding of the culture(s) discussed. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Show how the course provides at least one of the following: (i) a broad description and analysis of the interaction of intellectual, artistic, political, economic, social, and other aspects of a society’s cultural life; (ii) an intensive investigation of the cultural life of a society or group in a particular time and place; (iii) a focused investigation of particular aspects of the culture of a society or group (e.g., its art and architecture); or (iv) a comparative investigation of cultural systems and the development of constructs for cross-cultural sensitivity and analysis. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
If the course contains elements of the Western, U.S. Minority, and/or Non-Western categories, show how the emphasis of the course makes it more appropriate for the Western/Comparative Cultures category for which it is being proposed. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Show how the course provides understanding and awareness of significant aspects of the cultural tradition evolved from the confluence of Greek and Roman philosophical thought and European religious traditions, i.e., the cultural traditions associated with European and North American countries; OR show how the course provides understanding and appreciation of significant aspects of the cultural traditions of both Western and Non-Western cultural traditions, and indicate the comparisons and contrasts drawn between the different traditions. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Review Criteria
- Is concerned broadly with culture understood as the interaction among the intellectual, artistic, political, economic, and social aspects of a society or other cultural grouping.
- Treats topics and issues in a manner that will promote deepened understanding of the culture(s) discussed.
- Provides either:
- Broad description and analysis of the interaction of intellectual, artistic, political, economic, social, and other aspects of a society’s cultural life; or
- Intensive investigation of the cultural life of a society or group in a particular time and place; or
- Focused investigation of particular aspects of a society’s or group’s culture; or
- Comparative investigation of cultural systems and the development of constructs for cross-cultural sensitivity and analysis.
Courses in Western Cultures:
- Provides deepened understanding and awareness of significant aspects of the cultural tradition evolved from the confluence of Greek and Roman philosophical thought and European religious traditions (i.e., the cultural traditions associated with European and North American countries).
Courses in Comparative Cultures:
- Provides deepened understanding and awareness of significant aspects of both Western and non-Western cultural traditions, and indicates the comparisons and contrasts drawn between them.
EP.17.74
7.2 Courses approved as Western Cultures courses should provide deepened understanding and appreciation of significant aspects of the cultural tradition evolved from the confluence of Greek and Roman philosophical thought and European religious traditions (i.e., the cultural traditions associated with European and North American countries).
7.5 Departments may also wish to develop courses that treat western and non-western cultures comparatively in the same course. Such courses will count in the Western Cultures category.
7.6 In some instances, it will be difficult to ascertain whether cultures are Western or non-Western from purely geographical or group designations (e.g., Latin America or Middle East), and appropriate categorization will depend upon the emphasis of the particular course. Departments shall be responsible for designating and providing the rationale for proposed categorizations.
Non-Western Culture
NW or 1NW
CIM-C Questions
Show how the course treats topics and issues that promote a deeper understanding of the culture(s) discussed. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Show how the course provides at least one of the following: (i) a broad description and analysis of the interaction of intellectual, artistic, political, economic, social, and other aspects of a society’s cultural life; (ii) an intensive investigation of the cultural life of a society or group in a particular time and place; (iii) a focused investigation of particular aspects of the culture of a society or group (e.g., its art and architecture); or (iv) a comparative investigation of cultural systems and the development of constructs for cross-cultural sensitivity and analysis. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
If the course contains elements of the Western, U.S. Minority, and/or Non-Western categories, show how the emphasis of the course makes it more appropriate for the Non-Western Cultures category for which it is being proposed. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Show how the course provides understanding and appreciation awareness of significant aspects of cultural traditions that have their origins outside the Western cultural tradition. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Review Criteria
- Is concerned broadly with culture understood as the interaction among the intellectual, artistic, political, economic, and social aspects of a society or other cultural grouping.
- Treats topics and issues in a manner that will promote deepened understanding of the culture(s) discussed.
- Provides either:
- Broad description and analysis of the interaction of intellectual, artistic, political, economic, social, and other aspects of a society’s cultural life; or
- Intensive investigation of the cultural life of a society or group in a particular time and place; or
- Focused investigation of particular aspects of a society’s or group’s culture; or
- Comparative investigation of cultural systems and the development of constructs for cross-cultural sensitivity and analysis.
- Provides deepened understanding and appreciation of significant aspects of cultural traditions originating outside the Western cultural tradition.
EP.17.74
7.3 Courses approved for the Non-Western Cultures category should provide deepened understanding and appreciation of significant aspects of cultural traditions originating outside the Western cultural tradition.
7.5 Departments may also wish to develop courses that treat western and non-western cultures comparatively in the same course. Such courses will count in the Western Cultures category.
7.6 In some instances, it will be difficult to ascertain whether cultures are Western or non-Western from purely geographical or group designations (e.g., Latin America or Middle East), and appropriate categorization will depend upon the emphasis of the particular course. Departments shall be responsible for designating and providing the rationale for proposed categorizations.
U.S. Minority Culture
US or 1US
CIM-C Questions
Show how the course treats topics and issues that promote a deeper understanding of the culture(s) discussed. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Show how the course provides at least one of the following: (i) a broad description and analysis of the interaction of intellectual, artistic, political, economic, social, and other aspects of a society’s cultural life; (ii) an intensive investigation of the cultural life of a society or group in a particular time and place; (iii) a focused investigation of particular aspects of the culture of a society or group (e.g., its art and architecture); or (iv) a comparative investigation of cultural systems and the development of constructs for cross-cultural sensitivity and analysis. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
If the course contains elements of the Western, Non-Western, and/or U.S. Minority Cultures categories, show how the emphasis of the course makes it more appropriate for the category for the U.S. Minority Cultures category for which it is being proposed. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Show how the course provides understanding and awareness of significant aspects of one or more U.S. racial minority cultures. Courses that focus on other socially significant U.S. minority identities (for example, relating to sexuality, gender, religion, or disability) or on theories of diversity, inequality, or discrimination are also appropriate for this requirement if the experiences, conditions, and perspectives of one or more U.S. racial minority populations are significantly and appropriately integrated into the course. Please add relevant information from the syllabus indicating how this requirement is being met.
Review Criteria
- Is concerned broadly with culture understood as the interaction among the intellectual, artistic, political, economic, and social aspects of a society or other cultural grouping.
- Treats topics and issues in a manner that will promote deepened understanding of the culture(s) discussed.
- Provides either:
- Broad description and analysis of the interaction of intellectual, artistic, political, economic, social, and other aspects of a society’s cultural life; or
- Intensive investigation of the cultural life of a society or group in a particular time and place; or
- Focused investigation of particular aspects of a society’s or group’s culture; or
- Comparative investigation of cultural systems and the development of constructs for cross-cultural sensitivity and analysis.
- Provides deepened understanding and appreciation of significant aspects of the cultural tradition of a socially-significant, non-dominant population of the U.S.
If focuses on a racial minority population:
- The experiences, conditions, and perspectives of that population are appropriately and substantially addressed.
or
If focuses on socially-significant, non-racial minority identities or broadly on diversity, inequality, or discrimination:
- U.S. racial minority populations’ experiences are significantly represented.
EP.17.74
7.4 Courses approved for the U.S. Minority Cultures category should provide deepened understanding and appreciation of significant aspects of the cultural tradition of a socially-significant, non-dominant population of the United States. Courses that focus on a racial minority should appropriately and substantially address the experiences, conditions, and perspectives of that population. Courses that focus on socially-significant, non-racial minority identities (for example, sexuality, gender, religion, and disability) or broadly on diversity, inequality, or discrimination should significantly represent the experiences of U.S. racial minority populations.
Language Other Than English (LOTE)
To ensure that all graduates will have a working knowledge of a language other than English, each student must obtain credit or demonstrate proficiency at the third college semester level or satisfactorily complete the third secondary school year of language other than English.
EP.17.74
3.1 To have its language course sequence approved as meeting the General Education requirement, each language department must develop a statement of competencies expected of a student satisfactorily completing the third-semester level course. These competencies should be stated as a range of skills in reading, writing, speaking, and listening that demonstrate general language proficiency and contribute to cultural understanding. These competencies will vary from one language department to another.
3.2 Courses approved as meeting the Language Other Than English requirement should have well designed systems for the preparation and ongoing supervision of teaching assistants by faculty.
3.3 Courses approved as meeting the Language Other Than English requirement should be taught with section sizes small enough to promote development of a substantial working knowledge of the language.